|
Results
Posture Analysis
The eleven subjects that participated in the EMG analysis were
video-taped for postural analysis. The following are some
observations from review of postural data;
Hand Extension:
Subjects demonstrated hand extensions one and one half times
higher on the traditional keyboard (19.9 degrees) than on the
Kinesis (I 2.4 degrees). Extension on the traditional keyboard
was about 5 degrees greater than the maximum recommended hand
extension of 15 degrees from neutral position. Extension on the
Kinesis averaged three degrees less (12 degrees) than the maximum
recommended position of 15 degrees.
During later sessions, subjects sat in more reclined position
while using both keyboards and exhibited less hand extension.
Hand Deviation:
Average hand deviation was substantially higher on the
traditional than on the Kinesis keyboard. Average hand deviations
on the traditional keyboard ranged from 2 to 15 degrees greater
than the recommended maximum deviation of 10 degrees; average
deviation on the Kinesis was one degree less than the maximum
recommendation.
EMG Analysis
Electrical activity of the muscles controlling deviation,
extension and pronation was substantially higher during keying on
the traditional keyboard. This trend was consistent throughout
all six sessions. EMG activity of all four muscles was lower
during random letter keying than during text entry with both
keyboards.
Day 1 Test ................................................ Day 2 Test
Table 3
| Activity |
Time |
|
Activity |
Time |
| Instructions and Questionnaire |
25 minutes |
|
|
|
| Electrode Attachment |
15 minutes |
|
Electrode Attachment |
15 minutes |
| Type text |
20 minutes |
|
Type text |
20 minutes |
| Break |
5 minutes |
|
Break |
5 minutes |
| Type text |
20 minutes |
|
Type text |
20 minutes |
| Break |
5 minutes |
|
Break |
5 minutes |
| Type text |
20 minutes |
|
Type text |
20 minutes |
| Break |
15 minutes |
|
Break |
15 minutes |
| Type text |
20 minutes |
|
Type text |
20 minutes |
| Break |
5 minutes |
|
Break |
5 minutes |
| Type random letters |
20 minutes |
|
Type random letters |
20 minutes |
| Break |
5 minutes |
|
Break |
5 minutes |
| Type random letters |
20 minutes |
|
Type random letters |
20 minutes |
| Break |
5 minutes |
|
Break |
5 minutes |
| Questionnaire |
20 minutes |
|
Questionnaire |
20 minutes |
After all of the six sessions had been completed, each. subject
was given two questionnaires to complete. One questionnaire was
required by the ISO test methodology (see Appendix P) and the
other was developed by Kinesis (see Appendices C & D).
Subjects were also given another questionnaire developed by
Kinesis at the completion of the final day of testing (see
Appendix E).
All subject input was stored on the HP PC. Keying performance
was evaluated by calculating the number of words in text entry,
keystrokes in random entry, and errors during each session.
Action EMG Dynamic Evaluation Software recorded eight EMG
measures per second in 30- second increments for each of the six
20-minute sessions per keyboard. Of the possible 9,600
measurements (480 measures/minute x 20 minutes/session), 7,600
measurements were recorded far each session (due to the down time
between each of thirty four 30-second increments). There were
thus 7,600 measurements per channel for each 20-minute session,
totaling 45,600 measurements per channel for the 6 sessions per
day.
Postural data was calculated by measuring band and arm angle
deviation from neutral postures on video images with a
goniometer.
Channel 1: The EMG activity of the extensor carpi ulnaris
muscle (indicating ulnar deviation) was substantially and
consistently higher on the traditional keyboard than on the
Kinesis (see Figure 2). There was a slight decrease in EMG
activity during random letter keying for both keyboards.
EMG Data
Figure 2
Channel 2 : The EMG activity for the extensor communis digitorum
muscle (indicating extension) was substantially and consistently
higher on the traditional keyboard than on the Kinesis (see
Figure 3). There was a decrease in EMG activity during random
letter keying for both keyboards. The decrease in EMG was greater
for the Kinesis keyboard, indicating lower muscle load.
EMG Data
Figure 3
Channel 3: The EMG activity for the deltoid muscle (indicating
arm abduction at the elbow) was almost the same for the two
keyboards (see Figure 4). The activity of this muscle was lowest
of all the recorded muscle activity There was a slight decrease
in EMG activity during random letter keying on both keyboards.
EMG Data
Figure 4
Channel 4: The EMG activity for the pronator radii teres
(indicating arm pronation) was higher on the traditional keyboard
than on the Kinesis (see Figure 5). There was an equivalent
decrease in EMG activity during random letter keying for both
keyboards.
EMG Data
Figure 5
Previous page | Next page
|